TL;DR
- DeepSeek’s January 2025 release of R1 shook markets - a frontier-grade reasoning model trained for a reported $6M, a fraction of US lab budgets
- The app shot to #1 on Apple’s App Store inside days, and the open weights forced an industry-wide rethink of what training really costs
- Subsequent releases (V3 and beyond) cemented DeepSeek as a serious competitor in the open-source and cost-efficient AI category
- The story is less “China caught up” and more “the cost floor moved” - implications for closed-model pricing, GPU demand, and open-weight strategy
- Worth understanding as the moment that made cheap, capable, open models a credible default rather than a curiosity
Overview
Wow, crazy times, the best technology in the world is now becoming incredibly cheap and accessible to everyone! š¤Æ
DeepSeek’s AI chatbot has become the top free app on Apple’s store since its January launch. This rapid success, fuelled by DeepSeek’s cost-effectiveness compared to US competitors, has sent shockwaves through financial markets.
Venture capitalist Marc Andreessen has lauded DeepSeek’s AI as a “groundbreaking achievement”, while the company claims its models rival industry leaders like ChatGPT at a fraction of the cost. DeepSeek reportedly invested only $6 million in its development, a stark contrast to the billions spent by US AI companies.
Since the initial R1 release in January 2025, DeepSeek has continued iterating with improved models including DeepSeek V3 and other variants, establishing itself as a significant competitor in the open-source and cost-efficient AI space.
Links
- DeepSeek Homepage
- What is DeepSeek? Everything you need to know about the new ChatGPT rival that’s taken the App Store by storm
- DeepSeek just flipped the AI script in favor of open source ā and the irony for OpenAI and Anthropic is brutal
- Is Deepseek really that good?